Daily Journal Review
CLC-MG
Management Seer
2026-02-19
View on Seer
Child
Ellie MacLaird [$]
Age: 2.08 ID 57804
Date of Daily Journal
2026-02-19
Thursday
Total Score
31 / 36
Percent
86.1%
Attendance 1 9:49 AM–3:22 PM: 5:33Nap 12:00 PM–2:00 PM: 2:00Lunch[i] 11:48 AM–11:48 AM: 0:20Snack[i] 2:40 PM–2:40 PM: 0:20Class: Preparatory Preschool: 5:30
Review Criteria Rating (circle / highlight) Evidence (detected in journal) Rationale Score
Activities
(4)Great
(3)Good
(2)Okay
(1)Poor
(0)Bad
  • Activity @ 10:21 AM - Cognitive Development: Shapes in Our Environment
  • Activity @ 10:42 AM - Science and Discovery: Taste and Chart Activity
 Age band ≥16m; attended 5.55h. M=2 below target 4 but ≥ half (2); partial evidence ⇒ Activities score=2.
2
Meals
(4)Great
(3)Good
(2)Okay
(1)Poor
(0)Bad
  • Food: Lunch @ 11:48 AM
  • Food: Snack @ 2:40 PM
 Age=2.08y (≥16m; static); documented meals=2, expected=2, missing=0 ⇒ Meals score=4.
4
Events (Naps/Meals/Playground)
(4)Great
(3)Good
(2)Okay
(1)Poor
(0)Bad
  • Sleeping @ 12:00 PM
  • Activity-based playground indicator: Activity @ 10:42 AM - Science and Discovery: Taste and Chart Activity
 Naps recorded=1 (expected 1, cap 1); Playground recorded=0 (expected 1, cap 0); HPD indicators counted=1. Coverage 2/2 ⇒ Events score=4.
4
Check-in / out
(4)Great
(3)Good
(2)Okay
(1)Poor
(0)Bad
  • Daycare Start 1 @ 9:49 AM
  • Daycare End 1 @ 3:22 PM
 Valid start and end times with all entries within attendance window.
4
Photos
(4)Great
(3)Good
(2)Okay
(1)Poor
(0)Bad
  • Photo Attachment @ 10:21 AM
  • Photo Attachment @ 10:21 AM
  • Photo Attachment @ 10:21 AM
  • Photo Attachment @ 10:42 AM
  • Photo Attachment @ 10:42 AM
 Photos count=7 ⇒ Photos score=4.
4
Diaper / Toilet
(4)Great
(3)Good
(2)Okay
(1)Poor
(0)Bad
  • Toilet: Peed @ 10:04 AM
  • Toilet: Peed @ 11:56 AM
  • Toilet: Peed @ 2:13 PM
 toilet/diaper events=3 ⇒ Diaper/Toilet score=4.
4
Other Entries (Note/Mood/Health/Incident/Name to Face (NTF))
(4)Great
(3)Good
(2)Okay
(1)Poor
(0)Bad
No evidence listed.
 Activities + Meals + Events strong enough for partial credit.
3
General Impression – Center Perspective
(4)Great
(3)Good
(2)Okay
(1)Poor
(0)Bad
 Center perspective based on core section scores.
3
General Impression – Parent Perspective
(4)Great
(3)Good
(2)Okay
(1)Poor
(0)Bad
 Parent perspective based on core section scores.
3

Learning Indicators (Virginia ELDS)

Indicators: 4
Indicator Evidence Rationale Source
CD 1.3
Cognitive—Mathematics: Geometry & Spatial
  • Activity @ 10:21 AM - Cognitive Development: Shapes in Our Environment
 Inferred from activity text: “Cognitive Development: Shapes in Our Environment”. inferred
CD 4.4
Cognitive—Science: Earth/Environmental Science
  • Activity @ 10:21 AM - Cognitive Development: Shapes in Our Environment
 Inferred from activity text: “Cognitive Development: Shapes in Our Environment”. inferred
HPD 1.1
Health/Physical—Learning Through Senses
  • Activity @ 10:42 AM - Science and Discovery: Taste and Chart Activity
 Inferred from activity text: “Science and Discovery: Taste and Chart Activity”. inferred
CD 1.2
Cognitive—Mathematics: Measurement & Data
  • Activity @ 10:42 AM - Science and Discovery: Taste and Chart Activity
 Inferred from activity text: “Science and Discovery: Taste and Chart Activity”. inferred

Parent-Facing Summary

Ellie MacLaird [$] participated in activities such as Cognitive Development: Shapes in Our Environment. Meals included Lunch, Snack. Nap and/or playground time were documented.

Parent Delight (0–10)
10.0
Key Drivers
  • +photos(>=3)
  • +activity_description
  • +sleep_evidence
  • +meals_aligned
Entry Counts
Activities: 2Photos: 7Sleep events: 1

Journal Attachments

Center Attachment Feedback

No center attachment feedback provided.

Shapes in Our Environment Printout
3787.jpg
3787.jpg
3784.jpg
3784.jpg
3786.jpg
3786.jpg
Taste and Chart Activity Instructions
3814.jpg
3814.jpg
3806.jpg
3806.jpg

Percent of Time Student Spent with Teachers

  • Jessica Ovalle: 80.3%
  • Elianna Corbett: 20.9%
  • Jamiese Walker: 0.0%

Teachers Who Entered Information in this Review

  • Jessica Ovalle: 66.7%
  • Elianna Corbett: 33.3%

Gaps & Improvements (Actionable)

No improvement suggestions provided.

Data Gaps

No data gaps identified.

Notes